Differentiated approach to a method choosing of complicated gallstone disease treatment in patients of older age groups


  • B.S. Zaporozhchenko
  • V.V. Kolodiy
  • A.A. Gorbunov
  • P.T. Muraviov
  • D.A. Bondarec
Keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, calculous cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, gasless laparoscopy

Abstract

Results of 208 patients surgical treatment of elder and senile age with different forms of acute calculous cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis and its complications in the period from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed. Obstructive jaundice due to choledocholithiasis and severe comorbidity were present in all of the patients. The study showed that surgical tactics in patients of this group should be based on a comprehensive analysis of clinical and instrumental examination data. Method of choice in patients with acute cholecystitis, large, multiple and impacted common bile duct calculi is traditional open cholecystectomy, choledocholithotomy. In other cases, undoubted advantage has the laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic and endoscopic retrograde papillotomic choledocholithoextraction performed during pre-, intra- and post-operative period. In the treatment of patients with severe systemic diseases, especially of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, preference should be given to videoendoscopic "gasless" mode. The proposed differentiated approach can significantly improve the results of treatment of patients in this group.

References

1. Vetshev, P. S. (2005). Zhelchnokamennaya bolezn i holecistit. Klinicheskie perspektivy gastroenterologii, gepatologii, 1, 16–25. [in Russian].

2. Gallinger, Yu. I. & Hrustaleva, M. V. (2000). Sovremennye dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya pankreatobiliarnoj endoskopii. 4-j Moskovskij mezhdunar. kongress po endoskopicheskoj hirurgii, Materialy kongressa. Moskva: RNCH RAMN, 62–65. [in Russian].

3. Ermolov, A. S., Ivanov, P. A. & Turko, A. P. (1999). Osnovnye prichiny letalnosti pri ostrom holecistite v stacionarah Moskvy. Analiz letalnosti pri ostrom holecistite po materialam stacionarov g. Moskvy, Materialy gorodskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva: (b.i). [in Russian].

4. Zaporozhchenko, B. S. & Kolodii, V. V. (2013). Patent na vynakhid №101921 Ukraina, MPK А61В 17/32, 17/02, 19/10, 25/04.-2013. [in Ukrainian].

5. Zubrickij, V. F. (2008). Hirurgicheskaya taktika lecheniya oslozhnennyh form zhelchnokamennoj bolezni u lic pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta. Nauchnye trudy GIUV MO RF, 1, 56−59. [in Russian].

6. Ilchenko, F. N., Serbul, M. M. & Bordan, N. S. (2009). Osobennosti laparoskopicheskoj operacii pri oslozhnennyh formah zhelchnokamennoj bolezni. Ukrainskyi Zhurnal Khirurhii, 3, 73–76. [in Russian].

7. Karimov, Sh. I., Kim, B. L. & Hakimov, M. Sh. (2004). Vybor hirurgicheskogo lecheniya ostrogo holecistita u bolnyh s povyshennym operacionnym riskom. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii, 9(1), 115–119. [in Russian].

8. Lipnickij, E. M. & Klimov, P. V. (2000). Endoskopicheskaya retrogradnaya pankreatoholangiografiya i papillosfinkterotomiya u bolnyh s parapapillyarnymi divertikulami. 4-j Moskovskij mezhdunarodnyj kongress po endoskopicheskoj hirurgii, Tezisy dokladov. Moskva: RNCH RAMN. [in Russian].

9. Majstrenko, N. A., Shejko, S. B. & Stukalov, V. V. (2001). Holedoholitiaz – puti resheniya problemy. Annaly hirurgii i gepatologii, Perm, 32–33. [in Russian].

10. Malyarchuk, V. I. Rusanov, V. P. & Ivanov, V. A. (2004). Hirurgiya kalkuleznogo holecistita v gerontologicheskoj praktike. Klinicheskaya gerontologiya, 10(2), 22–28. [in Russian].

11. Natroshvili, I. G., Prudkov, M. I. & Beburishvili, A. G. (2014). Bezopasnost maloinvazivnyh vmeshatelstv pri ostrom kalkulyoznom holecistite. XVII sezd Rossijskogo Obshestva endoskopicheskih hirurgov, Tezisy dokladov. Endoskopicheskaya hirurgiya. Prilozhenie, 1, 283–284. [in Russian].

12. Nichitajlo, M. E., Grubnik, V. V. & Kovalchuk, A. L. (2005). Minimalno invazivnaya hirurgiya patologii zhelchnyh protokov. Kyiv: Zdorovia. [in Russian].

13. Puchkov, K. V. (2003). Vliyanie karboksiperitoneuma na gemodinamiku u pacientov grupp riska. Endoskopicheskaya hirurgiya. Prilozhenie, 108–109. [in Russian].

14. Samojlov, M. V., Kriger, A. G. & Voskresenskij, P. K. (2006). Holecistit. Zhelchnokamennaya bolezn. Holedoholitiaz. Moskva: Nauka. [in Russian].

15. Tretyakov, A. A. & Bohman, G. B. (1993). Rol endoskopicheskih i rentgenkontrastnyh metodov v diagnostike zheltuh. Hirurgiya, 5, 32–35. [in Russian].

16. Aspinen, S., Harju, J. & Juvonen, P. (2014). A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparo-scopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome. Surg. Endosc., 28(3), 827–832.

17. Zaporozhchenko, B. S., Kolodiy, V. V. & Gorbunov, A. A. Original endolifting system implementation in surgical treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis in patients with a high index of polymorbidity. Materials of 14th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Paris May, 2014. – Retrieved from http://www.eaes.eu/meetings/past-eaes- meetings.aspx.
Published
2017-09-29
How to Cite
Zaporozhchenko, B., Kolodiy, V., Gorbunov, A., Muraviov, P., & Bondarec, D. (2017). Differentiated approach to a method choosing of complicated gallstone disease treatment in patients of older age groups. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 21(1(1), 125-129. Retrieved from https://reports-vnmedical.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/94

Most read articles by the same author(s)