Features of laparoscopic hernioplasty of paracolostomy hernias in patients with combined abdominal pathology


  • K. Yu. Parkhomenko
Keywords: paracolostomy hernia, combined abdominal pathology, hernioplasty.

Abstract

Annotation. The aim of the study is to study the technological features and results of simultaneous laparoscopic hernioplasty of paracolostomy hernias in the presence of combined abdominal pathology. We analyzed the results of surgical treatment of 11 patients with paracolostomy hernias who were treated in the surgical department of the Municipal non-commercial enterprise of the Kharkov regional council “Regional Clinical Hospital” from 2016 to 2020, of whom – women – 4 (36%), men – 7 (64%), aged from 42 to 69 years old. Clinical, anamnestical and instrumental data for the prolongation of cancer were not identified in all patients. Out of 11 patients, in addition to paracolostomy hernia, 3 (27%) had inguinal hernias, 8 (73%) had postoperative ventral hernias. 3 (27%) patients with hernias also had cholecystolithiasis. All patients underwent laparoscopic hernioalloplasty of paracolostomy hernia. 3 patients underwent simultaneous TAPP for inguinal hernias, and 1 patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and TAPP. 6 patients with incisional ventral hernias underwent simultaneous IPOM according to the standard method, and 2 – according to the own method. Of the above, 2 patients suffering from cholecystolithiasis, in addition to hernioalloplasty, underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In 4 (36%) patients, viscerolysis was additionally performed due to the presence of an adhesive process in the abdominal cavity. Simultaneous hernioalloplasty TAPP and IPOM, as well as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, had no significant effect on the development of complications and the duration of hospitalization. The average length of inpatient treatment was 9.2 bed-days. The study proves the expediency of widespread simultaneous surgical interventions for hernias of the anterior abdominal wall, as well as the preference for laparoscopic techniques.

References

1. Achkasov, E. E., & Melnikov, P. V. (2015). Sovremennyie tendentsii v hirurgii pahovyih gryij: mirovaya praktika [Modern trends in inguinal hernia surgery: world practice]. Hirurgiya – Surgery, 10, 88–93.

2. Goncharov, A. L., Razbirin, V. N., Shalaeva, T. I., Cherner, V. A., Razbirin, D. V., Gurova, O. V., & Aslanyan, A. S. (2016). Profilaktika parakolostomicheskoy gryiji [Prevention of paracolostomy hernia]. Hirurgiya. Jurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov, 10, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20161052-56

3. Kriger, A. G., Fedorov, A. V., & Kolyigin, A. V. (2013). Mediko-ekonomicheskiy standart sochetannyih operatsiy [Medical and economic standard of combined operations]. Obscherossiyskaya Obschestvennaya Organizatsiya “Rossiyskoe obschestvo hirurgov” [All-Russian Public Organization “Russian Society of Surgeons”]. Vzyato s http://www.xn----9sbdbejx7bdduahou3a5d.xn--p1ai/stranica-pravlenija/standarty-v-hirurgicheskoi-praktike/mediko-yekonomicheskii-standart-sochetanyh-operacii.html

4. Sajin, A. V., Klimiashvili, A. D., & Kochiay, E. Laparoskopicheskaya transabdominalnaya preperitonealnaya i totalnaya ekstraperitonealnaya pahovaya gernioplastika, preimuschestva i nedostatki [Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal and total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty, advantages and disadvantages]. Rossiyskiy meditsinskiy jurnal – Russian medical journal, 21 (6), 46–49. Vzyato s https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/laparoskopicheskaya-transabdominalnaya-preperitonealnaya-i-totalnaya-ekstraperitonealnaya-pahovaya-gernioplastika-preimuschestva

5. Timerbulatov, V. M., Mehdiev, D. I., Timerbulatov, SH. V., Sagitov, R. B., YAmalov, R. A., & Gaynullina, E. N. (2016). Simultannyie operativnyie vmeshatelstva na organah bryushnoy polosti i zabryushinnogo prostranstva [Simultaneous surgical interventions on the organs of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space]. Hirurgiya. Jurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov, 3, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016340-44

6. Frolov, S. A., Rodoman, G. V., Moskalev, A. I., Kalashnikova, I. A., & Golubeva, M. YU. (2017). Predoperatsionnaya markirovka i otdalёnnyie oslojneniya kishechnyih stom. V Aktualnyie voprosyi koloproktologii, Materialyi Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mejdunarodnyim uchastiem [Preoperative labeling and long-term complications of intestinal stomas. In Topical issues of coloproctology, Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation]. Koloproktologiya – Coloproctology, 3 (61) (appendix), 89–90. Vzyato s https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj7zbnOzenuAhVlwIsKHW5BCBMQFjAIegQIDxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruproctology.com%2Fjour%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F1475%2F1475&usg=AOvVaw3HvCogmsN5ugy43dxcmitz

7. Aquina, C. T.,·Iannuzzi, J. C.,·Probst, C. P.,·Kelly, K. N.,·Noyes, K.,·Fleming, F. J., &·Monson, J. R. T. (2014). Parastomal Hernia: A Growing Problem with New Solutions. Dig. Surg., 31, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369279

8. Ece, I., Yilmaz, H., Yormaz, S., & Sahin, M. (2017). Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J. Minim. Access Surg., 13 (1), 37–41. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181394

9. Kalpesh, J. (2010). Laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair: a retrospective case series at a tertiary care center. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan Tech., 20 (6), 395–8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182009ae7

10. Nyhus, L. M. (2004). Classification of groin hernia: milestones. Hernia, 8 (2), 87–88. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0173-6
Published
2020-12-28
How to Cite
Parkhomenko, K. Y. (2020). Features of laparoscopic hernioplasty of paracolostomy hernias in patients with combined abdominal pathology. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 24(4), 600-603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2020-24(4)-07