Features of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with postoperative peritonitis


  • T.I. Tamm
  • V.V. Nepomnyashchiy
  • A.Ya. Bardyuk
  • A.P. Zakharchuk
Keywords: postoperative peritonitis, postoperative complications, ultrasound criteria, intestinal paresis.

Abstract

Annotation. The aim of the work is to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with postoperative peritonitis. The work is based on an analysis of the treatment results of 98 patients who were in the clinic from 2010 to 2019, of which 47 (48%) were admitted to the hospital with a peritonitis clinic, and 51 (52%) had a prolonged bowel paresis in the postoperative period. The diagnosis was established on the basis of data from an objective examination, laboratory parameters and radiation research methods — radiography of the abdominal organs and ultrasound. Based on the analysis of clinical material, it was found that for patients with primary peritonitis, more pronounced clinical symptoms are more characteristic. Postoperative peritonitis in its clinical manifestations proceeds under the mask of a protracted intestinal paresis. Due to the ultrasound criteria of 51 patients with postoperative paresis, 32 (63%) prolonged paresis were allowed conservatively, which avoided unnecessary repeated surgical interventions. In 19 (37%), the causes of postoperative complications were diagnosed and relaparotomy was performed in a timely manner to these patients. Postoperative mortality was 5.1%.

References

1. Benedykt, V. V. (2009). Sposib likuvannia funktsionalnoi neprokhidnosti tonkoi kyshky pislia abdominalnykh operatsii [A method of treating functional obstruction of the small intestine after abdominal surgery]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv surgical school, 4.1 (36), 146–148.

2. Benedykt, V. V. (2014). Intubatsiia tonkoi kyshky. Spirni pytannia i mozhlyvi shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Intubation of the small intestine. Controversial issues and possible ways to resolve them]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv surgical school, 2 (65), 51–55.

3. Bojko, V. V., & Ivanova, Yu. V. (2011). Vliyanie citokin orientirovannoj terapii na chastotu razvitiya gnojno-septicheskih oslozhnenij i vyzhivaemost bolnyh s posleoperacionnym peritonitom [The effect of cytokine-oriented therapy on the incidence of purulent-septic complications and survival of patients with postoperative peritonitis]. Khirurhiia Ukrainy – Surgery of Ukraine, 2 (38), 54–59.

4. Bondarev, R. V., Orehov, A. A., Selivanov, S. S., & Chibisov, A. L. (2012). Osobennosti diagnostiki i lecheniya rannej posleoperacionnoj kishechnoj neprohodimosti [Features of diagnosis and treatment of early postoperative intestinal obstruction]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv surgical school, 2 (53), 137–139.

5. Borisov, A. E., Levin, L. A., Mitin, S. E., & Staroselcev, K. L. (2000). Laparoskopicheskie vmeshatelstva v diagnostike i lechenii kishechnoj neprohodimosti, Materialy IX Vserossijskogo sezda hirurgov [Laparoscopic interventions in the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction, Materials of the IX All-Russian Congress of Surgeons]. Volgograd.

6. Voronoj, A. L., Mihajlichenko, V. Yu., Miminoshvili, A. O., & Sabodash, A. V. (2012). Elektrofiziologicheskie aspekty v differencialnoj diagnostike mehanicheskoj i dinamicheskoj posleoperacionnoj kishechnoj neprohodimosti [Electrophysiological aspects in the differential diagnosis of mechanical and dynamic postoperative intestinal obstruction]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv surgical school, 2 (53), 134–136.

7. Malyk, S. V., Podliesnyi, V. I., Lavrenko, D. O., & Ksonz, I. V. (2015). Dosvid zastosuvannia relaparotomii pry khirurhichnomu likuvanni zakhvoriuvan cherevnoi porozhnyny [Experience in the use of relaparotomy in the surgical treatment of diseases of the abdominal cavity]. Klinichna khirurhiia – Clinical Surgery, 10, 67–69. Vziato z http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/KlKh_2015_10_21.

8. Riha, A. S., & Smachylo, R. M. (2019). Faktory ryzyku dlia rozvytku pisliaoperatsiinykh abstsesiv cherevnoi porozhnyny [Risk factors for the development of postoperative abdominal abscesses]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola – Kharkiv surgical school, 1 (94), 100–103. ISSN 2308-7005.

9. Augestad, K. M., & Delaney, C. P. (2010). Postoperative ileus: impact of pharmacological treatment, laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery pathways. World’ J Gastroenterol., 16 (17), 2067–2074. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2067.

10. Мariette, C. (2006). Surgical management of post-operative peritonitis. J. Chir. (Paris), 143 (2), 84–87. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(06)73619-5.
Published
2020-05-18
How to Cite
Tamm, T., Nepomnyashchiy, V., Bardyuk, A., & Zakharchuk, A. (2020). Features of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with postoperative peritonitis. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 24(1), 110-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2020-24(1)-20