Transdisciplinarity and new horizons of medical research


Keywords: transdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary approach, knowledge integration.

Abstract

The article analyzes the prospects for the development of transdisciplinary research and their reflection in postgraduate medical education. The possibility of creating a system methodology that would provide transdisciplinary knowledge, as well as the theory of creating a hybrid reality as convergence and integration of a subject, digital, physical and social reality are considered. It is shown that the use of the transdisciplinary approach provides in biology and medicine the creation of new relations between the concepts of existing scientific disciplines, the establishment of a new system of laws that link the solution of problems of system integration when performing increasingly complex tasks. The proposed universal system of organization and processing of transdisciplinary knowledge can become the basis of their organization and serve as the basis for the creation of new theoretical concepts. The system can be applied to various areas of clinical medicine.

Author Biography

О.P. Mintser

Ozar Mintser - Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv, Ukraine, Professor, Head of Department of Medical informatics, ORCHID №  0000-0002-7224-4886, o.mintser@gmail.com

Для зв’язку: Суханова Ольга Олексіївна тлф. (050)05047021, olgasukhan@gmail.com

References

1. Voronenko, Yu. V., Mintser, O. P., & Palahin, O. V. (2016). Pisliadyplomna medychna osvita – novi horyzonty y perspektyvy [Postgraduate medical education – new horizons and perspectives]. Medychna osvita – Medical Education, 3, 12–16.

2. Manoxyna, N. V. (2013). Transdyscyplynarnie podxodi v sovremennoj nauke [Transdisciplinary approaches in modern science]. Vestnyk MІЕP – Vestnik MIEP, 1 (10), 31–36.

3. Mincer, O. P., & Vatliczov, D. V. (2016). Evolyuciya uzagalnennya, obrobky ta peredachi znan v medycyni ta biologiyi [Evolution of generalization, processing and transfer of knowledge in medicine and biology]. Medychna informatyka ta inzheneriya – Medical informatics and engineering, 1, 12–14.

4. Moky, V. S. (2011). Metodologiya transdistsiplinarnosti-4 [Transdisciplinarity methodology]. N: ANOITT [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from URL: http://www.anoitt.ru/tdbiblioteka/tdmetodol.php (date of the application: 01.06.2015).

5. Moky, V. S. (2014). Transdistsiplinarny aspekt biokhimii chelovecheskogo organizma [Transdisciplinary aspect of the biochemistry of the human body] Science Time, 12 (12), 362–368. Retrieved from URL: http://td-science.ru/images/kart/asp_bh.pdf.

6. Moky, M. S., Moky, V. S. (2014). Transdistsiplinarnost v vysshem obrazovanii: ekspertnye otsenki, problemy i prakticheskiye resheniya. [Transdisciplinarity in higher education: expert assessments, problems and practical solutions] Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 5. Retrieved from URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=14526.

7. Moky, V. S., & Moky, M. S. (2016). Ot distsiplinarnosti k transdistsiplinarnosti v federalnykh gosudarstvennykh standartakh vysshego obrazovaniya [From disciplinary to transdisciplinary in federal state standards of higher education]. Obshchestvennye nauki: elektrony nauchny zhurnal – Social Sciences: electronic scientific journal, 9 (27). Retrieved from URL: http://7universum.com/ru/social/archive/item/3435.

8. Palagin, A. V. (2013). Problemy transdistsiplinarnosti i rol informatiki. [Transdisciplinarity problems and the role of informatics] Kibernetika i sistemny analiz – Cybernetics and systems analysis, 49 (5), 3–13. Retrieved from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/86266.

9. Palahin, A. V., & Kurhaiev, O. P. (2009). Mizhdystsyplinarni naukovi doslidzhennia i optymizatsiia systemno-informatsiinoi pidtrymky. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy – Bulletin of the NAS of Ukraine, 3, 14–15.

10. Palagin, A. V., Kryvy, S. L., & Petrenko, N. G. (2012). Ontologicheskiye metody i sredstva obrabotki predmetnykh znany [Ontological methods and tools for processing subject knowledge]. Lugansk: Izdatelstvo VNU im. V. Dalya.

11. Prayd, V., Medvedev, D. A. (2008). Fenomen NBIC-konvergentsii: realnosti i ozhidaniye [NBIC Convergence Phenomenon: Reality and Expectation]. Filosofskiye nauki – Philosophical Sciences, 1, 97–117.

12. ARISE 2 Advancing Research in Science and Engineering. American academy of arts and sciences (2013). 18–24 Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieved from https://research.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/arise2.pdf.

13. Nicolescu, B. (2006). Transdisciplinarity – past, present and future. In Haverkott. B. & Reijntjes, C. (Eds). Moving Worldviews Conference Proceeding (pp. 142–165). Leusden, the Netherlands: ETC /Compas. Holland.

14. Nicolescu, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity as Methodological Framework for Going beyond the Science and Religion Debate. Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion, 2, 35–60. Retrieved from https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/XVMMSC.

15. Nicolescu, В. (Eds). (2008). Transdisciplinarity: Theory and Practice. USA, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. ISBN 1572738359, 9781572738355.

16. Simard, M., Gagné, A.-M., Lambert, R. D., Tremblay, Y. (2014). A transdisciplinary approach to the decision-making process in extreme prematurity. BMC Research Notes, 14 (7), 450. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-450.

17. Transdisciplinarity. Stimulating Synergies, Integrating Knowledge. (1998). UNESCO, Division of Philosophy and Ethics, 37–38.
Published
2019-03-01
How to Cite
MintserО. (2019). Transdisciplinarity and new horizons of medical research. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 23(1), 163-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2019-23(1)-29