Genetic analysis of embryos, obtained from vitrificated oocytes in donor’s programs of artificial reproductive technologies
The factors of cryopreservation can disrupt molecular mechanisms of normal chromosome’s segregation during meiosis and to increase the number of aneuploidy in embryos. The aim of the paper was to determine the frequency of aneuploid embryos obtained from the thawed oocytes in comparison with the fresh embryo cycles. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization with the study of such chromosomes as 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, Y. Statistical hypotheses were checked using criteria t, c2 at levels of significance p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001. The results have shown that the embryos obtained from vitrificated and fresh oocytes had identical frequency of chromosomal nondisjunctions. However, there was marked the increasing of the mosaicism frequency in the embryos get from thawed oocytes. Aneuploidies were rarer determine among the embryos obtained from vitrificated oocytes, which may indicate a less viability of oocytes with violations in the number of certain chromosomes. This research is the fragment of SRW IPCandC NASU 18.104.22.168 “Study of influence of cryopreservation factors by the vitrification method on morphologically functional descriptions of reproductive cells and embryos”, number of state registration 0116u003498.
2. Buderatska, N. O. & Petrushko, M. P. (2016). Ootsyty yak alternatyva embrionam pry kriokonservuvanni dlia vykorystannia u dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohiiakh [Oocytes as an alternative to embryos in cryopreservation for use in auxiliary reproductive technologies]. Problemy kriobiolohii ta kriomedytsyny – Problems of cryobiology and cryomedicine, 26 (4) b 375–382.
3. Petrushko, M. P. (2017). Suchasnyi stan problemy kriokonservuvannia reproduktyvnykh klityn ta embrioniv liudyny [The current state of the problem of cryopreservation of reproductive cells and human embryos]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 7, 44‒53. doi: doi.org/10.15407/visn2017.07.044.
4. Garcia, J. I., Noriega-Portella, L. & Noriega-Hoces, L. (2011). Effect of vitrification procedure on chromosomal status of embryos achieved from vitrified and fresh oocytes. Health, 3 (7), 467‒476. doi: 10.4236/health.2011.37077.
5. Gardner, D. K. & Schoolcraft, W. B. (1999). Culture and transfer of human blastocyst. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 11 (3), 307‒311. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10369209.
6. Harrison, R., Kuo, H., Scriven, P., Handyside, A. H. & Ogilvie, C. M. (2000). Lack of cell cycle checkpoints in human cleavage stage embryos revealed by a clonal pattern of chromosomal mosaicism analysed by sequential multicolour FISH. Zygote, 8 (3), 217–224. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11014501.
7. Jung, Y. J. & Cheon, Y. P. (2014). Improvement of the vitrification method suppressing the disturbance of meiotic spindle and chromosome systems in mature oocytes. Dev. Reprod., 18 (2), 117‒125. doi: 10.12717/DR.2014.18.2.117.
8. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, & Leibo SP. (2005). Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed. Online, 11 (3), 300‒308. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16176668.
9. Munne, S., Marquez, C., Magli, C., Morton, P. & Morrison, L. (1998). Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13 16, 18 and 21. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 4 (9), 863‒870. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9783846.
10. Yurchuk, T., Petrushko, M. & Fuller, B. (2018). Science of cryopreservation in reproductive medicine - Embryos and oocytes as exemplars. Early Hum. Dev., 14, S0378-3782(18)30559-0. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.08.016.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.