Comparison of different tactics of treatment in patients with high risk of rebleeding of gastroduodenal ulcer hemorrhage
The aim of the study was to compare of different tactics of treatment in patients with high risk of rebleeding after gastroduodenal peptic ulcer hemorrhage. The analysis of medical cards of patients who were admitted to the center for gastrointestinal bleeding with hemorrhagic shock was conducted. All patients had high risk of rebleeding which was estimated using Rockall scale. All patients were divided into groups: the first group consisted of 45 patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis; the second group included 101 patients who received drug therapy; the third group consisted of 32 patients who were operated. The compare criterion was the frequency of rebleeding, treatment outcome, and its duration.
2. Kyzhyrov, Zh. N., Sarsengalieva, A. R. & Turemura, A. S. (2015). Endoskopicheskie metody gemostaza pri krovotecheniyah zheludochno–kishechnogo trakta. Vestnik KazNMU, 2, 290–293. [in Russian].
3. Petrushenko, V. V. & Hrebeniuk, D. I. (2014). Likuvalna taktyka pry hastroduodenalnykh krovotechakh vyrazkovoho genezu. Shpytalna khirurhiia, 1, 55–57. [in Ukrainian].
4. Fomin, P. D. & Nikishaev, V. I. (2010). Krovotecheniya iz verhnih otdelov zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta: prichiny, faktory riska, diagnostika, lechenie. Zdorovia Ukrainy, 5, 8–11. [in Russian].
5. Trawick, E. P. & Yachimski, P. S. (2012). Management of non–variceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: Controversies and areas of uncertainty. World journal of gastroenterology, 11, 1159–1165.